"Well, the report does not recommend anything really newer than the old script. There is no reference whatsoever to where the electoral process was stalled. But what I find significant is that even this report confesses it is powerless to alter the course of electoral results. It is simply futuristic and purely suggestive, thus settling any doubts about any revision to the status quo," he was quoted by the outlet as saying.
"The EU distanced itself from its mandate of advising the Government on future improvements to be made, only to nail the Government and condemn the political landscape before and after elections. In actual fact, the essence of the EU report shows its disappointment and that they did not expect the revolutionary party to win the 23 August elections," he emphasized.
"Zimbabwe is not exceptional, the pitfalls and challenges faced by ZEC [Zimbabwe Electoral Commission] happen in [observer countries] too. There is no special reason to paint Zimbabwe black based on widely made mistakes," the expert was cited as saying.
"It is essential for the Government of Zimbabwe to examine the methodology, sources of information, and the overall credibility of the EU monitoring process. Questions may be raised about the independence of the monitors, their selection process, and any potential biases that could have influenced their findings," Dana noted.
"We also have substantial evidence of the EU EOM's [Election Observation Mission] clandestine operations with other election observer missions for the purpose of manipulating their reports to discredit the election outcome," he said.