- Sputnik Africa, 1920
Pan-African Frequency
Pan-African Frequency explores Africa’s growing influence in a world no longer ruled by one superpower. Each episode unpacks the intellectual, political, economic, and sociocultural forces defining 21st-century geopolitics and shaping the transition from a unipolar to a multipolar global order.

Selective Justice or Structural Design? Why Africa Dominates ICC Docket

Selective Justice or Structural Design? Why Africa Dominates ICC Docket
Subscribe
Through parallel analyses of the ICC’s disproportionate focus on Africa and Zambia’s refusal to trade US health security for mining rights, the episode presents a continent-wide pivot toward equitable, sovereignty-centered partnerships.
The ICC’s selective justice towards African countries continues to attract growing criticism from experts. In an extensive conversation with Dr. Mohammed Hussain AbdAlwahid Mohammed, a senior lecturer at Financial University in Russia, he dissects the foundational cracks in the global justice system, pointing to emerging African counter-institutions not as a threat to global justice but as a building block toward a genuinely universal system.
“Since the ICC founding, approximately 80% of its formal investigations have focused on African situations [...] The ICC's credibility problem is precisely this. It cannot separate the legitimacy of accountability from the illegitimacy of selectivity. Both things can be true simultaneously. Yes, accountability for Darfur matters, and yes, the ICC's selective application of that accountability undermines its moral authority [...] My assessment is a permanent, fully functional African criminal court is a 15- to 20-year project at minimum under optimal conditions, but the trajectory is moving in that direction [...] The question is not ICC or no ICC; the question is whether we can build a world where justice is not a geopolitical weapon,” he noted.
Zambia’s Rejection of Conditionality
Concurrently, Professor Fredrick Onyango Ogola, Kenya’s LDP 2027 presidential aspirant, presents an analysis of another form of Western neocolonialism toward African countries and their resources, as Zambia refused to sign a healthcare agreement with the US due to its linkage to its critical minerals. For him, the US strategy of bilateral negotiations, bypassing the African Union and Africa CDC, is interpreted not as diplomatic convenience but as a deliberate fragmentation tactic.
“Negotiating country by country can reduce coordination among African states and limit block-level resistance [...] The lesson of African governments is that fragmentation weakens leverage because coordination multiplies it. Zambia's posture, whether driven by principle or negotiation strategy, illustrates the value of holding a line until terms are clearer [...] Zambia's rejection and sovereignty, I can say, are not just about rejecting aid; it's about rejecting strings that tangle sovereignty. Africa is no longer for sale, not for $2 billion, not for any price, from copper to code. Our resources must serve our people first. Zambia has drawn a line in the sand: Partnerships, not pressure,” the professor said.
Discover more insights from our outstanding guests on the Pan-African Frequency podcast, proudly brought to you by Sputnik Africa.
In addition to the website, you can also catch our episodes on Telegram.
You can also listen to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Deezer, Pocket Casts, Afripods, and Podcast Addict
Check out all the episodes of Pan-African Frequency
Newsfeed
0