Selective Justice or Structural Design? Why Africa Dominates ICC Docket
Selective Justice or Structural Design? Why Africa Dominates ICC Docket
“The ICC's credibility problem is precisely this. It cannot separate the legitimacy of accountability from the illegitimacy of selectivity. Both things can be true simultaneously. Yes, accountability for Darfur matters, and yes, the ICC's selective application of that accountability undermines its moral authority.”
#PanAfricanFrequency discussed with Dr. Mohammed Hussain AbdAlwahid Mohammed, a senior lecturer at Financial University in Russia, as he deconstructs the ICC’s structural Africa bias, pointing to emerging African counter-institutions not as a threat to global justice but as a building block toward a genuinely universal system.
How realistic is the establishment of a permanent African criminal court in the near future? Share your take on this with us in the comments.
▶ Tune in to the full interview via:
Apple Podcasts | Afripods | Deezer | Pocket Casts | Podcast Addict | Spotify
You can also find podcasts on Telegram using the hashtag #SputnikRadio
Subscribe to @sputnik_africa
