Low effectiveness of UN peacekeeping missions despite its high cost is becoming increasingly "irritant", Russian Deputy Representative to the UN Anna Evstigneeva said on Monday.
"This gap between the actual results and the cost of missions is becoming an increasingly stronger irritant," Evstigneeva said during the UN Security Council meeting on peacekeeping.
The whole UN's peacekeeping and political activities need to be reconsidered, improved and brought "back to realistic scenarios," she added.
The UN Security Council is in charge of peacekeeping operations, yet financing is a shared responsibility. Every UN member is required to pay their share for peacekeeping, which is decided by a unique formula. Facts such as the state's economic wealth and whether it is already a member of the UN Security Council are taken into account.
Discussions on the future of the UN Peacekeeping should be held in appropriate forums of the UN, such as the UN General Assembly, and not in European capitals, the Russian envoy pointed out.
"We believe that any discussions on the future of peacekeeping and any initiatives on reforming this institution should be worked out and discussed not at individual conferences in European countries, but within the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly Special Committee on Peacekeeping Operations, which is a unique platform that involves all stakeholders, including troop-contributing countries," she noted.
Media reports emerged earlier in March that French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer are trying to convince 37 countries to join of a coalition ready to deploy peacekeepers in Ukraine and provide security guarantees to Kiev.
The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service said last year that the West could deploy some 100,000 troops in Ukraine under the guise of a peacekeeping force to restore Kiev's combat capabilities. The Kremlin has argued that in any conflict, the deployment of foreign peacekeepers is only possible with the consent of all parties to the conflict.