"In terms of economic reparations, it's very doubtful. I think the major consequences of this kind of policies [are] going to be in the symbolic area, is going to be in the recognition, finally, of Portugal that, regardless to the old ideology of Lusotropicalism, Portugal was another colonialism with all, of course, the major problems and impacts on African societies," he said.
"The reason why the president decided to do it is also a big question mark. I think it is related to preoccupying the space [in light] of the growth of this radical right-wing party that supports a very nationalistic vision of the past, that is always stressing the point of the old veterans of the colonial war. It's always stressing the point of the symbols of Portuguese national identity of the past, connected with the so-called "discoveries" and with the good things about Portuguese colonialism," he argued.
"In 1974, the process of independence was very favorable to the independentist elite associated with the liberation movements. And in the majority of cases, especially in Angola and Mozambique, those are still the main elements of political power 50 years later. [...] They were, in a way, those who got the transfer of power from the very end of the process of decolonization. And that's probably the reason why demands for reparation were very, very few," Pinto concluded.