"They can either accept it, be a partner in a multipolar world and probably occupy that hegemonic position for a few decades more to come. Or as we've seen, if they then opt to fight to show that they are the hegemon, they are the bully, then I think that position is going to be short-lived, and it is going to be expedited that they will be knocked off that perch," he explained.
"There are various ways to accept that you are losing that [hegemonic] position and that you have to make way for the next great power to occupy that space. I think we all know that China is well on its way there, and it's about what the United States is going to do to realize that eventuality," van Heerden stressed.
"There are many countries, including South Africa, that are still subscribing to the principle of nonalignment. They've learned the lessons of the Cold War post World War Two, that when too big elephants fight, it's the small guys, it's the grass that actually endures the pain. And so South Africa in this regard, when is a conflict between great powers, because no one is fooled by the fact that this is Russia against Ukraine, the South Africans decided they're going to take a nonaligned position and not take sides in the conflict," the expert noted.
"But I don't think this is the last of what we've seen. I think that there's going to be a few more nuggets up the sleeve of the State Department because it is important in a changing geopolitical environment where it is quite clear that the United States is beginning to wane in terms of its hegemonic powers, its unipolar environment," he explained. "I think that are going to use more and more strategies and tactics in their little toolbox to try and exert pressure on many countries, including South Africa."