How Ideological Battles Shaped Africa's Destiny

As African nations gained independence in the late 1950s and early 1960s, their leaders sought unity to overcome colonial legacies and boost political and economic growth. However, two main ideological poles—the Casablanca and Monrovia Groups—disagreed on how to achieve this. Their contrasting visions sparked a broader debate about the balance between unity and national sovereignty in postcolonial Africa. Despite these divisions, both groups played key roles in founding the Organization of African Unity (OAU) in 1963, which aimed to promote cooperation while respecting the sovereignty of each nation. The OAU later became the African Union (AU).

Sputnik Africa's correspondent engaged two Ghanaian academics in a thought-provoking discussion on the African Currents podcast, gaining valuable insights into the topic.

For his part, Professor Kwame Adum-Kyeremeh, Head of the Department of History at the University of Ghana, Legon, touches on the idea of African unity and highlights the contributions of two revolutionary figures who were staunch advocates of the Casablanca Group’s principles in the 20th-century struggle for African unity.

"I would define African unity as a concept and a movement. And the aim of this movement is to bring all Africans together to address the shared challenges. And harness collective potential and build a prosperous future for all Africans [...]. And Africans cannot speak of the struggle for African unity without mentioning two important personalities of Africa. [Kwame] Nkrumah can be described as a leader with a strong Pan-African vision. Nkrumah can be described as a man with decisiveness, a forward-thinking person, and a man who had a goal-oriented vision. He's not too different from that of Abdel Nasser, who we can describe as a charismatic leader with a strong sense of nationalism, a strong sense of colonialism, and we also see him as a man with decisiveness. So, there were no differences in how they approached diplomacy within Africa," Professor Adum-Kyeremeh states.

Moreover, Professor Samuel Adu-Gyamfi, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences at Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, examines how the ideological divide between the Casablanca and Monrovia groups within the Non-Aligned Movement undermined Africa’s global influence and diplomatic strength.

"So in May 1963, when they came together to do what they did, I think that it was a weaker union that was formed [...]. It was weak in the sense that. They could not agree to have the United States of Africa [...]. You can have different states with different people, different ethnicities but we could have decided to be conservative enough with all our differences and predicament. And that is what Africa refused to do. That was not possible because of Western interest, I dare say. It was also not possible because of certain interests of several of the African leaders [...]. So, the divisions within their ranks in many ways gave Africa no unity except for some of union," Professor Adu-Gyamfi says.

To find out what else our guests had to say, tune in to the African Currents podcast, brought to you by Sputnik Africa.

In addition to the website, you can also catch our episodes on Telegram.

► You can also listen to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Deezer, Pocket Casts, Afripods, Podcast Addict.

► Check out all the episodes of African Currents.