"The restitution movement is kind of stalled. There's resistance. And it started actually when they started making noise. When Benin bronzes were returned to Nigeria, to the National Museums and Monuments Commission. But then the Commission later took the collection back to the palace where it originated from. And there was an uproar in the Western world to say: Why did they do that? It's not what we agreed on. And as Africans, we ask, is the West supposed to tell us what we do with our heritage when it has been returned? Can the thief tell you what to do with your vehicle, which has been recovered that it is now with the owner? Can he tell you that you can only go there? You cannot go there? I do not think that is proper. So as Africa, we don't agree to that kind of approach [...]. And so things have stalled because the West is resisting, starting from that point. But the resistance is also coming in other forms, such as this so-called provenance research," Dr. Sithole notes.
"The cultural materials that were expropriated, looted and in some cases stolen, particularly during the period of the colonization of Africa, are so valuable in various ways. We can talk about the technological know-how of the time. When you watch some of these materials, they are so intricately made, and you may have to look at them closely to see the technological traditions of the time. Many of them also served in various social contexts. They did not just produce them as pieces of art, but they had symbolic functions, connecting various groups of people. They had agency that permitted them to network with various groups of people. So, the social context in which they function is also important. Then, there is the ideological context in which many of those items function. And I should explain that in many African societies, especially those I am familiar with in the Western part of the continent, there is no separation between matter and spirit," Professor Gavua says.